Factors that impact on the effectiveness of professional development programs for science teachers in Saudi Arabia

Mobarak Mohammed Alqahtani

Abstract


The Saudi Arabian Government has made a substantial investment in reforming the science curriculum in Saudi Arabia. The need for effective professional development (PD) programs is especially crucial in the context of recent curriculum reform in Saudi Arabia. The country has adopted new science curricula following the guidelines of renowned global publishers like McGraw-Hill. However, the introduction of the new science curriculum is posing challenges for science teachers, as it requires a paradigm shift from a teacher-centred to a learner-centred pedagogy. The research for this research involved an in-depth study on the impact of mandatory PD programs on Saudi Arabian science teachers in order to identify potential challenges to achieving the expected level of benefit from the PD programs. This study used a qualitative approach to data collection techniques. through employs three main methods for data collection, observation ,open-ended questionnaire and interview. the most effective professional development programs are likely to be those that address the specific subject matter that relates to the teaching issues faced daily by teachers, rather than those that cover vague and decontextualised educational or pedagogical concepts. Other factors include teachers’ involvement in learning communities, the facilities and resources provided by the school, and individual learning styles. On the other hand, common factor responsible for the failure of professional development programs is that the content covered is not relevant to the teachers’ specific needs. PD programs in Saudi Arabia are mainly focused on quantity instead of quality 


Keywords


professional development programs, science teachers, global education, science teacher, barrier

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al salomy, M. A (2016). Saudi society and change. The Family Magazine in Riyadh - in cooperation with the Asiah Center for Consulting and Training.Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Al-Issa, A. (2009). Education reform in Saudi Arabia. Riyadh: Dar AlSaki. Alabdulkareem, S. A. (2017). Saudi science teachers' perceptions of implementing inquiry in

science class. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(12), 67-78.

Alhassan, R. P. M. (2012). The impact of the use of collaborative learning strategies compared to traditional teaching methods on student motivation and computer skills acquisition. Journal of Educational Sciences, 25, 391-418.

Almazroa, H., & Al-Shamrani, S. (2015). Saudi science teacher professional development: Trends, practices and future directions. In N. Mansour & S. Al-Shamrani (Eds.), Science education in the Arab Gulf States: Visions, sociocultural contexts and challenges (pp. 3-21). Rotterdam: Springer.

Alsafe, M. E. (2003). Study of Saudi society (2nd ed.). Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Al Khuraiji Publishing and Distribution.

Alshamrani, S., Aldahmash, A., Alqudah, B., & Alroshood, J. (2012). The current situation for science teacher professional development in Saudi Arabia. The Letter of Arabic Gulf, 126, 215-261.

Alshehry, A. (2018). Case study of science teachers' professional development in Saudi Arabia: Challenges and improvements. International Education Studies, 11(3), 70-76.

Appova, A., & Arbaugh, F. (2018). Teachers' motivation to learn: Implications for supporting professional growth. Professional Development in Education, 44(1), 5-21.

Ballet, K., & Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Struggling with workload: Primary teachers’ experience of intensification. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1150-1157.

Beatriz, P., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership: Volume 1 Policy and practice. OECD Publishing.

Chen, S., & Kompf, M. (Eds.). (2012). Chinese scholars on Western ideas about thinking, leadership, reform and development in education (Vol. 7). Springer Science & Business Media.

Elyas, T., & Picard, M. (2010). Saudi Arabian educational history: Impacts on English language teaching. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 3(2), 136-145.

Gupta, T., Herrington, D., & Yezierski, E. J. (2018). Target inquiry: A case for quality professional development. In P. MacIntyre & T. Gregersen (Eds.), Innovative practices in teacher preparation and graduate-level teacher education programs (pp. 383-416). IGI Global.

Johnson, C. C. (2006). Effective professional development and change in practice: Barriers science teachers encounter and implications for reform. School Science and Mathematics, 106(3), 150-161.

Kelly, J., & Cherkowski, S. (2017). Collaboration, collegiality, and collective reflection: A case study of professional development for teachers. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 169.

Le Fevre, D. M. (2014). Barriers to implementing pedagogical change: The role of teachers' perceptions of risk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 56-64.

Leithwood, K. A. (1992). The principal’s role in teacher development. In M. Fullan & A.Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.Loughran J. (2017). Professional learning that matters. In K. Smith & J. Loughran (Eds.),

Quality learning: Professional learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Lowe, B., & Appleton, K. (2015). Surviving the implementation of a new science curriculum.

Research in Science Education, 45(6), 841-866. Madden R. (2017). The practice room. In K. Smith & J. Loughran (Eds.), Quality learning: Professional learning. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.

Mayer, D., & Lloyd, M. (2011). Professional learning: An introduction to the research literature. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, Melbourne. Prepared in partnership with Deakin University and the Queensland University of Technology.

Richter, D., Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2011). Professional development across the teaching career: Teachers’ uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 116-126

Sellen, P. (2016). Teacher workload and professional development in England’s secondary schools: Insights from TALIS: 10 October 2016. Education Policy Institute.

Simon, S., & Campbell, S. (2012). Teacher learning and professional development in science education. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & McRobbie, C.J. (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 307-321). Netherlands: Springer.

Smith, K. V. (2017). Conditions for learning building and sharing teacher professional knowledge. In K. Smith & J. Loughran (Eds.), Quality learning: Teachers changing their practice (pp. 29-38). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Hargreaves (1992). Teacher development and educational change (pp. 86-103).

Sywelem, M. M. G., & Witte, J. E. (2013). Continuing professional development: Perceptions of elementary school teachers in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Modern Education Review, 3, 881-898.

Terhart, E. (2013). Teacher resistance against school reform: Reflecting an inconvenient truth. School Leadership & Management, 33(5), 486-500.

Uysal, H. H. (2012). Evaluation of an in-service training program for primary-school language teachers in Turkey. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(7).

van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., & Walma van der Molen, J. H. (2015). Improving primary teachers’ attitudes toward science by attitude-focused professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 710-734.

Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: An international review of the literature. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.

Wilson, S. M. (2013). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340, 310-313.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v2i2.12072

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Research in Education

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter View My Stats

Creative Commons License
International Journal of Research in Education (IJRE)
 by LPPM Universitas PGRI Semarang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.