Students’ emotional engagement in online collaborative writing through google document
Abstract
Learning writing has been conducted by using various methods. Collaborative writing is one of method that used in writing learning practice. Studies about collaborative writing reveal that online collaborative writing is effective to promote students’ writing quality. There are many previous studies have explored the students’ perception, effectiveness, and benefits of collaborative writing. However, the study about students’ emotional engagement in collaborative writing is limited. This study aims to explore students’ emotional engagement during online collaborative writing through Google Docs. The exploration of students’ emotional engagement is beneficial to understand students’ feelings and emotions during the learning process. Classroom Action Research is used as the research design of the study. Participant of the research is four eleven grade high school students. The research was conducted at the SMA Negeri 1 Cikarang Barat in three weeks. Semi-structured interview and documentation were used for collecting the data. The result of the study showed that online collaborative writing through Google Docs involves students to learn writing enthusiastically. Online collaborative writing also involves students cognitively by acquiring new vocabulary during the online collaborative writing activity.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abe, M. (2020). Interactional practices for online collaborative writing. Journal of
Second Language Writing, 49, 100752. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100752
Ariyanti, A. (2016). The Teaching of EFL Writing in Indonesia. DINAMIKA ILMU, 16(2),
doi: 10.21093/di.v16i2.274
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative
Research in Psychology, 3 (2). pp. 77-101. ISSN 1478-0887
Chao, Y., & Lo, H. (2011). Students' perceptions of Wiki-based collaborative writing for
learners of English as a foreign language. Interactive Learning
Environments, 19(4), 395-411. doi: 10.1080/10494820903298662.
Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google
Docs on EFL learners’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 787-815.
doi: 10.1080/09588221.2017.1363056.
Eccles, J., & Wang, M. T. (2012). Part I commentary: So, what is student
engagement anyway? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie
(Eds.1, Handbook of research on student engagement (pp.133-145). New York:
Springer.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement:
Potential of the concept: State of the evidence. Review of Educational
Research, 74, 59-109. doi: 10.3102%2F00346543074001059
Fredericks, J. A., McCloskey, W. H. (2012). The Measurement of Student Engagement: A
Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self-report Instruments. In
S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.1, Handbook of research on
student engagement (pp.193-218). New York: Springer.
Hughes, J., & Kwok, O. (2007). Influence of student-teacher and parent-teacher
relationships on lower achieving readers’ engagement and achievement in
the primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 39-51. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.39
McDonough, K., De Vleeschauwer, J. and Crawford, W. (2018). Comparing the
quality of online collaborative writing, collaborative prewriting, and individual
texts in a Thai EFL context. System, 74, 109-120.
doi: 10.1016/j.system.2018.02.010
Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of online collaborative writing in
L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 286-305. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.010
Sieber, T. (2018). What is Google Docs and How to Use It [MUO]. Retrieved 28 from
https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/google-docs-faq/.
Susanto, D. A., & Yosephine, M. (2017). Teachers ‘perceptions towards teaching writing using word games; the case study of junior high schools in Semarang, central java, Indonesia. Media Penelitian Pendidikan: Jurnal Penelitian dalam Bidang Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 11(2).
Voelkl, K. E. (2012). School Identification. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly &
C. Wylie (Eds.1, Handbook of research on student engagement (pp.193-218). New
York: Springer.
Vorobel, O., & Kim, D. (2017). Adolescent ELLs' online collaborative writing practices
in face-to-face and online contexts: From perceptions to action. System, 65,
-89. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2017.01.008.
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on
fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26, 445-466.
doi: 10.1177/0265532209104670.
Zhang, M. (2018). Online collaborative writing in the EFL classroom: The effects of L1
and L2 use. System, 76, 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2018.04.009.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v12i2.9191
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal) ISSN 2086-5473 (Print), ISSN 2614-1639 (Online)
English Education Study Program
Faculty of Language and Arts, Universitas PGRI Semarang
(Kampus 4) Jalan Gajah Raya, Semarang
Th. Cicik Sophia B., S.S., M.Pd.
Phone: +62 857-2679-7979
Email: eternalpbi@upgris.ac.id