Aplikasi Rasch Model: Pengembangan Fluids Assessment (Fass) Berdasarkan Taxonomy of Introductory Physics Problems (TIPP)
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menghasilkan produk Fluids Assessment (FAss) berdasarkan Taxonomy of Introductory Physics Problems (TIPP) yang layak pada materi fluida dinamis. Analisis validitas menggunakan pendekatan Item Response Theory (IRT) dengan satu Parameter Logistik (PL) yakni parameter tingkat kesukaran atau lebih dikenal dengan Rasch Model. Selain itu, produk yang dihasilkan dianalisis dengan pendekatan teori klasik untuk melihat daya beda dan efektivitas distraktor. Penelitian ini merupakan Research and Development dengan mengadaptasi model pengembangan Borg and Gall. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 34 butir soal dinyatakan valid menurut para ahli dengan analisis Content Validity Ratio (CVR). Sedangkan hasil analisis berdasarkan Rasch Model menunjukkan 17 butir soal valid dan reliabilitas soal diperoleh sebesar 0,90 dengan kategori baik. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa Fass memiliki tingkat kesukaran relatif sedang, daya beda yang baik, dan pengecoh yang berfungsi. Hasil implementasi menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar siswa mengusai setiap level TIPP kecuali level 3a, 4d dan 4c yang berkaitan dengan matching, investigating, dan experimenting.
The purpose of this study was to produce a Fluids Assessment (FAss) product based on an appropriate Taxonomy of Introductory Physics Problems (TIPP) on dynamic fluid material. Validity analysis uses the Item Response Theory (IRT) approach with a Parameter Logistic (PL), which is a difficulty level parameter or better known as the Rasch Model. Also, the resulting product was analyzed with a classical theoretical approach to see the difference in distinguishing power and effectiveness of the distractor. This research is a Research and Development by adapting the development model of Borg and Gall. The results showed that 34 items were declared valid according to experts with Content Validity Ratio (CVR) analysis. While the analysis based on the Rasch Model shows that 17 items are valid and the reliability of the questions is 0.90 in the good category, it can conclude that the Fass has a relatively moderate level of difficulty, a good difference in power, and a deception that works. The results of the implementation showed that most students mastered every level of TIPP except level 3a, 4d, and 4c relating to matching, investigating, and experimenting.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Kusairi S 2012 Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan 3 p 68–87
Permendiknas 2007 Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru 1–32
Yani A 2014 Mindset Kurikulum 2013 (Bandung: Alfabeta, CV)
Kuswana and Sunaryo W 2013 Taksonomi Berpikir (Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset)
Sutiadi A and Kurniawati R 2015 Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Nasional SMA Bidang Fisika Tahun 2014 Menggunakan Taxonomy of Introductory Physics Problem Prosiding Pertemuan Ilmiah XXIX HFI Jateng & DIY (April) 306–309
Fabby C and Koenig K M 2015 Journal of STEM Education 16 4 p 20–27
Sumintono B and Widhiarso W 2015 Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch: pada Assesment Pendidikan (Cimahi: Penerbit Trim Komunikata)
Borg W R and Gall M. D 1989 Educational Research: An Introduction, Fifthy Edition (New York: Longman)
Lawshe C H 1975 A Personnel Psychology 28 4 p 563–575
Widhiarso W 2010 Prosedur Pengujian Validitas Isi melalui Indeks Rasio Validitas Isi (CVR) (Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi UGM)
Adams R J and Khoo S T 1996 Quest: The interactive test analysis system version 2.1 (Melbourne: ACER)
Setyawarno D 2016 Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Butir Soal dengan Analisis Aplikasi Quest (Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta)
Ebel R L and Frisbie D A 1986 Using Test and Item Aanalysis to Evaluate and Improve Test Quality. Essentials of Educational Measurement (New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc)
Hidayati K 2012 Manual Item And Test Analiysis (Iteman): Pedoman Penggunaan Iteman (Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta)
Ibnu M, Indriyani B, Inayatullah A and Guntara Y 2019 Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP 2 1 p 205-210
Fitriatun A and Sukanti 2016 Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia 3 p 1–11
Aida N and Hamdani A S 2017 Suska Journal of Mathematics Education 3 2 p 130–139
Erdiani G and Liliawati W 2019 Karakterisasi Instrumen Tes Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dengan Analisis Model Rasch pada Materi Alat Optik (Bandung: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika) 1 1 p 99–108
Teodorescu R E, Bennhold C, Feldman G and Medsker L 2013 Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 9 1 p 1–20
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v11i2.5903
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika ISSN 2086-2407 (print), ISSN 2549-886X (online)
Gedung Utama GU.2.01 FPMIPATI, Universitas PGRI Semarang
Jl. Lontar No. 1-Dr. Cipto, Kampus 1 UPGRIS, Semarang
Email: jp2f@upgris.ac.id