EFFECTIVENESS OF OBJECTION INSTITUTIONS IN RESOLVING TAX DISPUTES
Abstract
Taxes have an important role in state revenue, but tax disputes often arise between taxpayers and the Direktorat Jendral Pajak (DJP). The dispute resolution mechanism through the objection institution regulated in the legislation faces challenges related to independence and effectiveness. This study uses a normative juridical method with a descriptive approach to analyze the mechanism and effectiveness of objection institutions in handling tax disputes. The results of the study show that although the objection procedure has been established, most of the objection applications are rejected, this raises doubts about the independence of the institution due to the inequality of position between the taxpayer and the DJP which affects the effectiveness of the objection institution. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the need for reforms to increase transparency and fairness in the objection process to be more effective in resolving tax disputes.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
Asmorowati, M. (2011). Objection disputes are compared to tax court disputes based on applicable regulations. Journal of Legal Insights, 25(02), 369–380.
Djatmiko, D. H. M. H. (2016). Problematic Tax Disputes in the Tax Justice Mechanism in Indonesia. Legal and Public Relations Bureau of the Administrative Affairs Agency of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Retrieved from http://www.komisiyudisial.go.id/assets/uploads/files/bunga-rampai-2013-putih-hitam-pengadilan-khusus.pdf
Asmorowati, M. (2011). Objection disputes are compared to tax court disputes based on applicable regulations. Journal of Legal Insights, 25(02), 369–380.
Djatmiko, D. H. M. H. (2016). Problematic Tax Disputes in the Tax Justice Mechanism in Indonesia. Legal and Public Relations Bureau of the Administrative Affairs Agency of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Retrieved from http://www.komisiyudisial.go.id/assets/uploads/files/bunga-rampai-2013-putih-hitam-pengadilan-khusus.pdf
Dr KHALIMI Moch iqbal. (2020). Tax Law Theory and Practice (Vol. 1).
Hamdani, A., Haskar, E., & Farda, N. F. (2023). Amnesty: Legal Journal of Tax Dispute Resolution through Tax Objections. Amnesty: Law Journal, 5(2), 191–206.
Ispiyarso, B. (2018). Legal remedies in tax disputes. Administrative Law & Governance Journal, 1(2), 9–14.
Ispriyarso, B. (2019). Weaknesses of Tax Objection Institutions. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(2), 248–258. doi:10.14710/alj.v2i2.248-258
Komara, A. (2012). Easy Ways to Understand KUP (General Provisions and Taxation Procedures). Jakarta: Bee Media Indonesia Publisher.
Pudyatmoko, Y. S. (2009). Introduction to Tax Law. Yogyakarta: ANDI OFFSET.
Sa'adah, N. (2018). Review of Tax Dispute Resolution through Objection Institutions. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 1(3), 268–279.
Sugiharti, D. K., Muttaqin, Z., Singadimedja, H. N., & Cahyadini, A. (2021). Tax Law (Pe Print). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Supriyadi, Setiawan, B., & Bintang, R. M. (2019). Evaluation of objection institutions in fair tax dispute resolution at the Direktorat Jendral Pajak. INDONESIAN TAX JOURNAL (Indonesian Tax Review), 2(2), 6–19. doi:10.31092/jpi.v2i2.640
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v7i2.19996
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Meta-Yuridis
.png)
Jurnal Meta-Yuridis under Fakultas Hukum Universitas PGRI Semarang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.upgris.ac.id/index.php/jp3.