ANALYSIS OF THE RIGHTS OF SUSPECTS IN PRETRIAL DECISIONS IN MAKASSAR STATE COURT DECISION NUMBER 6/PID.PRA/2020/PN.MKS

Rahmat Islami, Andi Muh. Sofyan, Audyna Mayasari Muin

Abstract


Makassar District Court Decision Number 8/Pid.Pra/2020/PN.Mks, present to annul Makassar District Court Decision Number 6/Pid.Pra/2020/PN.Mks. This means that there is a conflict between the two decisions, where the Makassar District Court Decision Number 6/Pid.Pra/2020/PN.Mks., should have been implemented before the Makassar District Court Decision Number 8/Pid.Pra/2020/PN.Mks. was issued. The above conditions cause the suspect's rights to not be exercised. as if the Makassar District Court Decision Number 6/Pid.Pra/2020/PN.Mks., is something that doesn't need to be implemented, even though it is a decision that has permanent legal force. This research is a normative research that is descriptive in nature, analyzes the judge's legal considerations in deciding the Pretrial Decision Number 6/Pid.Pra/2020/PN.Mks so that the applicant accepts the request based on juridical considerations, namely the suspect is not on DPO status, and the determination of the applicant as a suspect does not meet the evidence. enough start. Furthermore, the judge's legal considerations in deciding the Pretrial Decision Number 8/Pid.Pra/2020/PN.Mks., so that the applicant's application is accepted is based on juridical considerations, namely the issuance of SP3 by the Makassar Polrestabes which was carried out on a holiday, as well as the issuance of a complete letter of investigation results. by the public prosecutor (P-21).

Keywords


Convict; Pre-Trial; Decision

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adami Chazawi, (2003). Kejahatan terhadap Tubuh & Nyawa, PT. Raja Grafindo, Jakarta.

Alfitra, A. (2016). Disparitas Putusan Praperadilan Dalam Penetapan Tersangka Korupsi Oleh KPK. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 4(1). doi:10.15408/jch.v4i1.3201.

Chandra M. Hamzah. (2014). Penjelasan Hukum tentang Bukti Permulaan yang Cukup. Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia (PSHK), Jakarta

Dinda, C. P., & Munandar, T. I., Praperadilan Terhadap Penetapan Status Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 1(2), 2020. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i2.9568

Hasrina, S., Karim, S., & Mirzana, H. A. (2021). Konsep Kepentingan Umum Dalam Asas Oportunitas Pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law, 3(1), https://doi.org/10.31960/ijocl.v2i2.431

Irwansyah, (2020). Penelitian Hukum, Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel, Mirra Buana Media, Yogyakarta.

MH. Tirtaamidjaja, (1955) Pokok-Pokok Hukum Pidana, Fasco, Jakarta.

Muksin, M. R. S., & Rochaeti, N. (2020). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menggunakan Keterangan Ahli Kedokteran Forensik Sebagai Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i3.343-358

Rais, M. (2017). Nilai Keadilan Putusan Hakim Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Al Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan, 6(1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.v6i1.4870

Rusli Muhammad. (2007). Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, ,




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v6i1.14188

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Meta-Yuridis



Jurnal Meta-Yuridis

Alamat Redaksi: Kantor Jurnal Meta-Yuridis UPGRIS Gedung Pusat Ruang Fakultas Hukum, Jalan Sidodadi Timur No. 24 Dr. Cipto Semarang.

Telp. (024) 8316377; Faks. (024) 8448217.

Pos-email: Meta-Yuridis@upgris.ac.id dan metayuridisjurnal@gmail.com.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.