Berpikir komputasi di dalam kurikulum merdeka : analisis pada guru matematika

Saiful - Marom

doi:10.26877/aks.v14i1.15269

Berpikir komputasi di dalam kurikulum merdeka : analisis pada guru matematika

Saiful - Marom

Abstract

Tujuan dari artikel ini adalah menyoroti serta mendiskusikan aspek tentang persepsi awal terkait kemampuan berpikir komputasi pada pembelajaran matematika pada kurikulum merdeka. Selanjutnya kegiatan pelatihan ini juga memiliki kontribusi ke dalam kegiatan penelitian sehingga harapannya membawa perubahan pada proses pembelajaran matematika. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode campuran yaitu penelitian kualitatif dan penelitian kuantitatif, Selanjutnya metode kualitatif yang digunakan adalah studi kasus. Selanjutnya pada proses pengambilan data menggunakan analisis data kuantitatif. Hasil dari kegiata penelitian ini adalah adalah menunjukkan bahwa kurangnya pengetahuan awal terkait berpikir komputasi olwh guru. Serta kegiatan pelatihan ini mampu menghasilkan pembelajaran matematika yang terintegrasi matapelajaran matematika.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ackermann, Editt. 2001. “Piaget’s Constructivism, Papert’s Constructionism: What’s the Difference?” Future of Learning Group Publication 45(1):76–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.t01-1-05013.x.

Aho, Alfred V. 2011. “Computation and Computational Thinking.” Computer Journal 55(7):833–35. doi: 10.1093/comjnl/bxs074.

Anggraena, Yogi. 2021. “Computational Thinking (CT) Dalam Kurikulum Nasional.” Center for Curriculum and Bookkeeping Ministry of Education and Culture.

Barcelos, T. S. 2012. “Teaching Computational Thinking in Initial Series: An Analysis of the Confluence among Mathematics and Computer Sciences in Elementary Education and Its Implications for Higher Education.” 38th Latin America Conference on Informatics, CLEI 2012 - Conference Proceedings.

Barr, Valerie, and Chris Stephenson. 2011. “Bringing Computational Thinking to K-12: What Is Involved and What Is the Role of the Computer Science Education Community?” ACM Inroads 2(1):48–54. doi: 10.1145/1929887.1929905.

Bocconi, Stefania, Augusto Chioccariello, and Jeffrey Earp. 2018. “The Nordic Approach To Introducing Computational Thinking And Programming In Compulsary Education.” Report Prepared for the Nordic@BETT2018 Steering Group 42.

Brackmann, C. P. 2017. “Development of Computational Thinking Skills through Unplugged Activities in Primary School.” ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 65–72.

Brasil. 2018. “Ministério Da Educação. Base Nacional Comum Curricular.” Http://Basenacionalcomum.Mec.Gov.Br/.

Brennan & Resnick. 2012. “New Frameworks for Studying and Assessing the Development of Computational Thinking.” Studies in Computational Intelligence 727:135–60. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-64051-8_9.

Curzon, Paul, Peter W. McOwan, Quintin I. Cutts, and Tim Bell. 2009a. “Enthusing & Inspiring with Reusable Kinaesthetic Activities.” SIGCSE Bull. 41(3):94–98. doi: 10.1145/1595496.1562911.

Curzon, Paul, Peter W. McOwan, Quintin I. Cutts, and Tim Bell. 2009b. “Enthusing & Inspiring with Reusable Kinaesthetic Activities.” Pp. 94–98 in Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE ’09. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.

Fan, Lianghuo, and Mailizar Mailizar. 2020. “Indonesian Teachers ’ Knowledge of ICT and the Use of ICT in Secondary Mathematics Teaching.” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 16(1):1–13.

Kalelioğlu, Filiz, Yasemin Gülbahar, and Volkan Kukul. 2016. “A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review.” Baltic J. Modern Computing 4(3):583–96.

Katz, Donald L. 1960. “Conference Report on the Use of Computers in Engineering Classroom Instruction.” Commun. ACM 3(10):522–527. doi: 10.1145/367415.993453.

Kaup, C. F. 2022. “Orchestration Between Computational Thinking and Mathematics.” Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICST 435:77–85.

Marks, Eli S., and Martin Greenberger. 1963. “Management and the Computer of the Future.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 58:1193.

Marom, Saiful, Stevanus Budi Waluya, Scolastika Mariani, and Bambang Eko Susilo. 2023. “Computational Thinking Patterns In The Mathematical Modeling Process : Self-Efficacy Pre- Service Mathematics Teacher.” The Seybold Report 18(03):1551–68. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DVAXT.

Moreno, Jesús, Gregorio Robles, Marcos Román, and Juan David Rodríguez. 2019. “No Es Lo Mismo: Un Análisis de Red de Texto Sobre Definiciones de Pensamiento Computacional Para Estudiar Su Relación Con La Programación Informática.” Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación En Tecnología Educativa 26–35. doi: 10.6018/riite.397151.

Peralta, Helena, and Fernando Albuquerque Costa. 2007. “Competência e Confiança Dos Professores No Uso Das TIC. Síntese de Um Estudo Internacional.” Sísifo. Revista de Ciências Da Educação (3):77–86.

Prieto-Rodriguez, E., and R. Berretta. 2014. “Digital Technology Teachers’ Perceptions of Computer Science: It Is Not All about Programming.” Pp. 1–5 in 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.

Rich, Kathryn M., Kathryn M. Rich, Aman Yadav, and Christina V. Schwarz. 2019. “Computational Thinking, Mathematics, and Science: Elementary Teachers’ Perspectives on Integration.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 27(2):165–205.

Seymour; Papert. 1980. “Mindstorms.”

Shadish, William R., Thomas D. Cook, and Donald Thomas Campbell. 2002. Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference.

Soboleva, E. V. 2021. “Formation of Computational Thinking Skills Using Computer Games in Teaching Mathematics.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 17(10):1–16. doi: 10.29333/ejmste/11177.

Vieira, Márcia. 2021. “Efetivação Do Uso de Tecnologias Na Educação: Desafios Na Formação de Recursos Humanos.” 71–80. doi: 10.5753/desafie.2015.10042.

Waterman, K. P. 2020. “Integrating Computational Thinking into Elementary Science Curriculum: An Examination of Activities That Support Students’ Computational Thinking in the Service of Disciplinary Learning.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 29(1):53–64. doi: 10.1007/s10956-019-09801-y.

Wing, Jeannette M. 2006. “Computational Thinking.” Communications of the ACM 49(3):33–35. doi: 10.1145/1118178.1118215.

Wing, Jeannette M. 2015. “Computational Thinking It Represents a Universally Applicable Attitude and Skill Set Everyone, Not Just Computer Scientists, Would Be Eager to Learn and Use.” (April).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v14i1.15269