TRANSITIVITY AND MOOD ANALYSIS ON ENGLISH EDUCATION UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS' RECOUNT TEXTS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG

Muhammad Fakhrurozi, Riana Eka Budiastuti, Testiana Deni Wijayatiningsih

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan mendeskripsikan penggunaan fitur kebahasaan dalam menulis teks cerita ulang yang ditulis oleh mahasiswa pendidikan bahasa inggris di universitas muhammadiyah semarang. Hal tersebut dapat direalisasikan dengan melakukan analisis transitivitas dan mood terhadap teks. Peneliti menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dalam mengeksplorasi hasil analisis berupa tipe-tipe proses dan mood. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa penggunaan transitivitas dan mood ditemukan didalam teks cerita ulang mahasiswa. Pertama, terdapat enam tipe proses yang ditemukan dari total 322 kalimat. Proses material (49.7%), Proses Behavioral (5.5%), Proses Mental (14.5%), Proses Verbal (3.2%), Proses Relational (24.2%), dan Proses Existential (2.8%). Sementara itu, pada struktur mood, didapatkan sebanyak 564 klausa, sebesar 99.8% dituliskan dalam mood deklaratif, sedangkan hanya ditemukan satu interogatif klausa (0.2%). Selain itu, material process dan declarative mood type menjadi jenis transitivity process dan mood type yang dominan ditemukan dalam teks cerita ulang mahasiswa. Oleh karena itu, peneliti menyatakan bahwa mahasiswa dikategorikan sebagai penulis yang berpengetahuan luas dan kritis dalam mengeksplorasi pengalaman masa lalu mereka dalam bentuk tulisan, yaitu teks cerita ulang. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari penggunaan proses material atau kata kerja aksi dan klausa deklaratif sebagai fitur bahasa yang dominan digunakan mahasiswa untuk membuat teks recount yang terstruktur dengan baik.

Keywords


mood; teks cerita ulang; transitivitas

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, I., Mukhtar, A., Mansoor, A., & Butt, M. (2021). A study of the ideational function in systematic functional grammar: Transitivity analysis of Nelson Mandela’s speeches. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology (PJAEE), 18(7), 2510–2521.

Apendi, T. L., & Mulyani, E. R. (2020). The analysis of transitivity process of students’ descriptive texts. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 3(3), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v3i3.p359-366

Budiastuti, R. E. (2018). Revealing students’ motivation and interest in writing recount text using mystorybook.com. English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings, 2(0), 330–333. https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/article/view/3510

Donkoh, S., & Mensah, J. (2023). Application of triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Applied Biotechnology & Bioengineering, 10(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.15406/jabb.2023.10.00319

Elsie, K. F., Suarnajaya, I. W., & Adnyani, N. L. P. S. (2020). Transitivity analysis of students’ recount texts. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 9(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.31571/bahasa.v9i1.1681

Fadilah, R., & Kuswoyo, H. (2021). Transitivity analysis of presidential debate between Trump and Biden in 2020. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 2(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.33365/llj.v2i2.1374

Faradina, W. N., & Emilia, E. (2024). An analysis of student’s recount text: An SFL approach. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 9(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v9i1.751

Febrianty, N. A., & Rozelin, D. (2024). Mood analysis in teacher’s scaffolding talks: A study of interpersonal meaning in English classroom communication. Indonesian EFL Journal (IEFLJ), 10(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v10i1.9341

Ha, N. T. H., & Thao, D. T. (2021). A close insight into systemic Mark Halliday's functional grammar and the analysis of the text “A grandmother with muscles” in terms of transitivity, mood and theme-rheme pattern. TNU Journal of Science and Technology, 226(03), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.4174

Hadiani, D. (2019). Interpersonal meaning in students' explanation texts. JELE (Journal of English Language and Education), 5(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.26486/jele.v5i1.742

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

Hastuti, E., Setiawati, A., & Oswari, T. (2021). Transitivity analysis of Lydia Machova’s speech in TED Talks: A systemic functional linguistics study. Journal of Language and Literature, 9(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.35760/jll.2021.v9i1.4041

Jing, L., & Fengjie, L. (2019). A case study of transitivity analysis of Trump’s winning speech based on systematic functional grammar. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 7(4), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190704.12

Khairunnisaak, Sartika, D., & Asmara, R. (2022). The analysis of students’ difficulties in writing recount text. Journal of English Education Program, 3(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeep.v3i1.50496

Lubisa, I. V., Sinaga, N. T., & Saragi, C. N. (2023). An analysis of the English transitivity process of Prabowo speech at Forum IISS. Education Achievement: Journal of Science and Research, 2(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.51178/jsr.v4i2.1536

Morgan, H. (2024). Using triangulation and crystallization to make qualitative studies trustworthy and rigorous. The Qualitative Report, 29(7), 1844–1856. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6071

Nurinayah. (2021). An interpersonal meaning analysis of the second-grade students’ narrative texts. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy, 5(1), 116–123.

Puspitasari, V., Warsono, W., & Sutopo, D. (2021). The realization of mood and modality in the analytical exposition of the undergraduate students of Tidar University. English Education Journal, 11(3), 375–382. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v11i1.46349

Ramadhani, C. A., & Samsi, Y. S. (2023). Interpersonal meaning analysis of procedure text at junior high school student’s textbook "English for Nusantara". Journal of Social Science Research, 3(3), 6390–6399. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v3i3.2859

Ramadhani, M., Nainggolan, J. K., & Sitompul, D. M. (2023). Analysis ideational metafunction in recount text at SMAN 1 Panai Hilir Labuhanbatu, Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial, 2(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.58540/jipsi.v2i1.177

Santos, K. D. S., Ribeiro, M. C., Queiroga, D. E. U. D., Silva, I. A. P. D., & Ferreira, S. M. S. (2020). The use of multiple triangulations as a validation strategy in a qualitative study. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, 25(2), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020252.12302018

Shi, W., & Gu, Z. (2022). A transitivity analysis of the British Queen’s Parliament speech. Scholars International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 5(11), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijll.2022.v05i11.007

Sianipar, S. D., Ginting, S. A., & Siregar, T. M. S. (2020). A transitivity analysis on students’ writing recount text. Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.24114/reg.v9i2.24657

Supadmi, N., Sudipa, I. N., Budiarsa, M., & Laksana, I. K. D. (2020). Transitivity in the text of Indonesia president speech. The International Journal of Language and Culture, 2(2), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4097485

Utami, A. R., Munawwaroh, K., & Dinata, R. P. (2022). Transitivity analysis of students in writing recount text at tenth grade senior high school 3 Jambi City. JELT: Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.33087/jelt.v6i1.97

Utari, Y., & Fajriah, Y. N. (2023). Analysis of mood structure in EFL students’ narrative texts. English Education & Applied Linguistics Journal (EEAL Journal), 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31980/eealjournal.v6i1.2904

Wijayatiningsih, T. D., & Wilujeng, A. (2015). Genre-based writing. CV. Rafi Sarana Perkasa.

Xiaoqing, M. (2023). Transitivity analysis of Faust’s speech from the perspective of systemic functional grammar. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 5(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.25236/fsst.2023.050103

Zhang, Y. (2017). Transitivity analysis of Hillary Clinton’s and Donald Trump’s first television debate. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(7), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.7p.65




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/jp3.v11i2.24277

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JP3 (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Profesi Pendidik) telah terindeks pada:

         

 

Creative Commons License

JP3 (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Profesi Pendidik) by LPP Universitas PGRI Semarang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.upgris.ac.id/index.php/jp3.